Although the general principles of the flood prevention policy in France seem to be broadly accepted, the performance of the systems in place is often disappointing. We put forward the hypothesis that this operational inefficiency is partially explained by the presence, amidst a robust and uncontested flood prevention policy, of unmovable areas of potential conceptual debates unconsciously hidden. Any innovative idea must be buttressed by a broad enough expertise to validate its compatibility with the existing doctrine whilst assuring technical compatibility with it. The analyse of what happened in the case of hydrogeomorphology, shows the success of a strategy used to facilitate the incorporation of a naturalist technical method into a body of doctrine solidly anchored in an culture of science and engineering but also inhibiting any potential theoretical developments which could have, trough discourse, given impetus to the development of the theoretical aspects of natural disaster prevention in France. Paradoxically, the felicitous conditions at the emergence of hydrogeomorphology are not present anymore despite the increased volume of reflexion generated by the application of the Directive 27/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 27 on the assessment and management of flood risks.
Transenvir
Le projet TRANSENVIR retenu par l’ANR en 2016 (financement 2016-2019 exceptionnellement prolongé jusqu’en mars 2021) nourrit l’ambition de proposer des documents et ressources pour comprendre la place occupée par les villes françaises dans la montée, l’institutionnalisation et la reconfiguration des politiques environnementales des années 1950 jusqu’à nos jours.